Musings
|

Signs of Change: Reflections from a Winter Landscape (from the 24 December 2009 edition of the Columbia Paper)
by Anna Duhon
Winter
is settling upon the land. Perhaps more than any other season,
winter entices, even requires us to read the signs of its mercurial
nature closely. Are the roads clear? Is the ice thick
enough to walk on? You can’t get out of the way of winter, or at
least it must be respectfully accommodated. While
many who work closely with the land have this attunement in every
season, what I love about winter is that it reaches straight into the
most comfortably insulated aspects of our lives and commands our
attention. And so it is winter when we most often peer into
whatever blanket of weather is upon us and try to interpret,
understand, and predict what it might mean for our lives, whether the
evening commute or something more global. “So
much for global warming,” I often hear when the thermometer dips
particularly low, or the wind is especially biting. “I’m
worried,” is what my friend said on a particularly balmy day last
week. Though the recent climate talks in Copenhagen are far
removed from life in Columbia County, the specter of climate change is
more and more peppering our conversations about the weather. Interpreting
our experiences of the weather against the backdrop of memory, many of
us have the sense that the climate, as seen in our little corner of the
world, is somehow changing; that things aren’t as they used to
be. Yet it is hard to be sure. As weather buff
Benjamin Watson once said about the Northeast, “Rarely will you hear a
native describe a season or year as being typical.”There
are, however, local signs of a changing climate that transcend our
individual senses, and can only be understood in the context of trends
over time; it is these signs I have been recently trying to read.
When are the first and last frosts each year? How long is each
growing season? How intense are the rainstorms? How warm is
each winter? Such are the markers that scientists around the
world are using to gauge changes in climate, but they can also be the
measures of far more locally felt changes.In
Columbia County and the Hudson Valley, the results are clear: the
recent trend lines are heading up (longer trends are more
ambiguous). Any given year, mind you, may be atypically warm or
cold, rainy or dry – such frequent oscillations, in fact, seem to be
the norm. But beneath the yearly variability is a steady recent
trend towards warmer, wetter weather, more intense storms, shorter
winters and longer growing seasons. [See graphs of these trends]Take
the past half-century in Hudson, for instance. The last frost is
coming an average of 11 days earlier in spring, while the first frost
is coming 9 days later. In other words, winter is shortening and
the growing season is getting longer. Indeed, it has extended by
nearly three weeks. One
of the predictions for the Northeast that I read with particular
interest is that our local climate will get wetter, with more frequent
and intense rainstorms and flooding. In Hudson, the average
yearly amount of rain has increased by 15 inches over the last 50
years, mostly in summer and fall. Meanwhile the annual number of
days with intense, pounding rainfalls, the kind that overflow drainage
systems and flood creek beds, has also increased: by 5.7 days over the
last six decades. And
then there is the local warming, most clearly pronounced in the winter
season we are now in. As I write this, it is convincingly
cold outside. But looking at the local trends in winter
temperature – a warming of around 3 degrees in Albany over the last 115
years, for instance – I worry that winter in the Hudson Valley may come
to mean something very different than its cold and snowy associations.Therein
lies the question we are left with: what do the signs point
towards? And then, what can we do about it? That the local
climate is trending towards warmer, wetter weather is evident.
That these changes are part of global-scale, human-induced climate
change is the scientific consensus
that has been building for decades. These are signs in which we
are deeply implied, both as the recipients of such changes, and their
proximate cause. Our culture and livelihoods are woven deeply
into the seasons, and perhaps just as deeply into the carbon-dependence
that may change them indefinitely. We are left to reflect, in this cold, quiet season, on the signs that encircle our lives, and our own ability to respond.

Global Context of Climate Change: The
climate is always changing, but observations undeniably show that the
global climate is getting warmer. The map below shows changes in
global temperature (in degrees Celsius) over the period 1881-2009. The scientific consensus ( see sources cited below)
attributes the recent warming trend primarily to human-induced
emissions of "greenhouse gasses," (GHG) such as carbon dioxide, methane
and nitrous oxide, that have occurred since the industrial revolution.
GHG emissions predominantly come from the burning of fossil
fuels, industrial-scale agricultural practices, and land use changes
such as forest clearing. The first two graphs below indicate the
relationship between temperature changes over the last 1000 years, and
carbon dioxide concentrations. The third graph shows the change
in type and amount of carbon emissions. Climate
change does not only refer to warming, but also changes in
precipitation patterns, the frequency and intensity of storms, sea
level rise, and other related aspects. The following graph
depicts the annual global precipitation trends from 1900-2000.
Note the increase of precipitation in the Northeast US.  Source: IPCC TAR 2001, SYR Figure 2-6a Sources: For more information on climate change science, causes, impacts, mitigation and adaptation, see the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report
released in 2007. For information more specific to the impacts of
climate change in the United States, see the U.S. Global Change
Research Program's 2009 report Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. 
Regional Contributions to Climate ChangeWhile
many are aware that the United States and China are the largest GHG
emitters, the significant role that regions within the US play in GHG
emissions is less well-known. New York State, for example, is
responsible for 1% of global GHG emissions (while having .3% of the
world's population). A 2001 graph shows that if the Northeast was a
country, it would be ranked 7th in the world for greatest annual GHG
emissions:
Source: Climate Change in the US Northeast: A Report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment, October 2006
Climate Change in the Northeast and New York State:Looking
at the weather records and observations in the Northeast United States,
it is clear that climactic changes are afoot. The 2006 report,
Climate Change in the US Northeast, details many of these changes,
including rising temperatures and sea levels, reduced snowfall,
increased amount, frequency and intensity of rain events, a longer
growing season (by 2.5 days each decade), earlier spring bloom
dates by 4-8 days, and earlier ice out dates and spring snow melt
leading to earlier peak river flows. In New York State, for
example, average annual temperatures have increased by 2.3 degrees
since 1970, and winter temperatures have increased by over 5 degrees in
that same period. The sea level is 15 inches higher in New York
harbor now, than it was in 1850 ( NY DEC Climate Change in the Hudson Valley).
Below is a map illustrating the increased amounts and frequency
of very heavy rainfall events in the Northeast, as compared to the rest
of the country. Source: Climate Change in the US Northeast: A Report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment, October 2006
In
general, the Northeast has gotten warmer and wetter, as these graphs of
average annual temperature and precipitation over the 20th century show.
Local Climate Change Trends in Hudson and AlbanyWhile
the regional picture of recent climate change is useful, it is also
interesting to see what climate trends exist at a very local level.
In Columbia County, Hudson has the longest and most consistent
weather record, though it mostly extends from the mid-20th century.
A little further north, Albany has a far longer weather record
that reaches back into the 19th century, and is therefore a good local
indicator of longer-scale trends. Below are graphs of the
precipitation trends in Hudson over the last 52 years. This
trend represents an increase of 15 inches in annual average
precipitation over this period.

Though
there are few 19th century weather records for Hudson, there are some
early published records that give a small window into Hudson
precipitation in the 1820s-1840s. This graph includes
precipitation data beginning in 1827.  The
evident increase in precipitation over the last half century has not
occurred evenly across the seasons. By tracking the precipitation
in each season, one can see that the greatest increases in
precipitation are in summer and fall, while the average annual
precipitation has in fact declined slightly in winter. This
reflects the regional climate trends observed in the Northeast, as well
as the predictions for future precipitation trends in the region.  The
intensity of rainfall has also been changing. One way to measure
this is by calculating the number of days with extreme precipitation
events, defined as days in which more than 1 inch of rain fell within a
24 hour period. The graph below shows an increase of 5.7 days per
year with extreme precipitation events from 1947-2008.  The
Albany average annual precipitation from 1947-2008 follows a similar
trend as in Hudson, though less pronounced. The trend below shows
an increase of 6 inches in average annual precipitation during this
period.  The
precipitation trend in Albany looks very different, however, when the
full timeline of weather records are taken into account. Below is a
graph of annual average precipitation in Albany from 1826 to the
present. Notice how the climate in the 19th century also had
periods of high precipitation comparable to the present. There
are many factors that have influenced changing precipitation patterns
over time; human-induced greenhouse gas emissions are only the most
recent.  The
annual average temperature has also changed over the course of weather
records in Hudson and Albany, though in both cases it has trended up.
In Albany, where there is a consistent record from 1889 to the
present, there has been a 2.3 degree Fahrenheit increase in the mean
average temperature.   One
consequence of increasing temperatures has been a shift in seasonal
markers. The last frost in spring has on average occurred earlier
over time, while the last frost in the fall has occurred later.
Below are graphs of the first and last frost dates in Hudson.
The last frost date in spring has occurred an average of 11 days
earlier over the last 57 years of consistent records, while the first
frost date in fall has occured an average of 9 days later.   Such
shifts have profound implications for the growing season. Below,
graphs show the increase in the average length of the growing season in
both Hudson and Albany. Implications of Local Climate Change for Farmers: While
a longer growing season may seem like a positive trend for farmers,
there are many potentially adverse implications. The timing of
agricultural activity and natural cycles is extremely important, and
this is alreadly being affected. Earlier blossoming plants could
easily be damaged by one fluke frost, or crop pests and diseases may be
able to overwinter, move north earlier, or find better conditions to
flourish. Flooding during important stages of crop production is
also an increased concern with earlier snow melt and greater
precipitation. Finally, increased temperatures, especially more
high degree days, could have an adverse affect on the ability to
produce cold-adapted crops crops (i.e. apples, potatoes, blueberries),
and greatly reduce dairy yields, which depend on an optimatl
temperature range. Overall, the tremendous year-to-year variation
in temperature and precipitation make it hard to plan for and adapt to
a trend playing out over decades.
Responses:
David Burg, President of Wild Metro, sent us this comment on 16 January 2010:
I appreciate recieving your recent columns. I have a question
about the recent graphs showing rising average temperatures. A great
deal depends on where the temperature is measured. Since your data are
from Hudson and Albany, could some of rise be due to urban heat island
effects? It is well known that an increase in buildings and pavement
raises local temperatures in cities. How much would this have affected
the measurements you report? Is there any comparable data for local
forests during the same time?
Temperatures fluctuate over time. It is only 12 to 15 thousand
years since glaciers covered our region, a very recent event in terms
of the age of the planet. Since the ice age our area experienced a
period of thousands of years when it was warmer than it is today. If
global warming is real, there is still a question of how much is due to
human activities. The recent sad events revealing climate data
manipulation in England showed the risk of overselling fears related
to climate change.
Fortunately, the need to take action has strong benefits that
transcend any uncertainty regarding climate change. Cutting energy
use, ending sprawl development (which increases energy used in
transportation and heating buildings) and making deep cuts in air
pollution are all actions with multiple benefits, no matter how much
they contribute to global warming. Pollution affects human health, is
increasing the acidity of the oceans, and impacts economic
activities.
By placing so much emphasis on climate change alone we miss other
related impacts, such as destruction of green space from
sprawl, spread of invasive species, and new forms of pollution such as
medical chemicals winding up in our drinking water. Global warming is
also being used as an excuse for bad solutions to energy problems, such
as toxic drilling for natural gas in upstate watersheds.
We need lots of local actions, from better rail transportation to
energy conservation to "smart growth" of buildings and infrastructure.
Society needs to take in the whole picture and devise economically
sensible solutions that will allow people and nature to flourish.

|